The first WiPRMAPhil (+lunch) of the academic year was held on September 16.
- Willem van Dijk from the OZSW told us about the Onderzoeksschool and its activities
- Nicky van Dijk briefly told us about her bachelor thesis and we discussed what adapations could be made to make it into a publishable article
- Lotje Siffels spoke about the topic of her bachelor thesis and how she could adapt it for a medical journal
The second WiPRMAPhil of the year took place on October 7.
- Daan Dronkers presented his thesis.
- Niels van Miltenburg, RMA alumnus and now lecturer/researcher at the UU, talked about his own development from his graduation of the Master program to the present day, do's and don'ts during and after your Master and the stuff he wished they would have told him during his time as an RMa student.
- Joel told us about various options for PhD's in the Netherlands.
Lotje has very kindly taken notes during this last meeting which you can find here.
The third WiPRMAPhil took place on Friday, October 28.
- Jetze Zoethout presented his paper in progress for Topics in Metaphysics (on the logic and metaphysics of time)
- Marin Kaufmann initiated a discussion about the process of paper writing, especially in its early stages, in the context of her paper for the CRTF.
The fourth WiPRMAPhil was an RMA Discussion Meeting and took place on November 15.
There we discussed the state and future of the RMA. More info here.
The fifth WiPRMAPhil took place on Thursday, December 15.
- Suus Jacobi gave a presentation on moral judgments in medical ethics, specifically top-down vs bottom-up approaches (find a great further discussion about her presentation here on the forum.
- Some feedback was given to the OC members regarding the state of our master's program
- We arranged a wonderful Christmas dinner
The sixth WiPRMAPhil took place on Tuesday, January 17.
- Chris Meyns gave information and tips on doing a PhD outside of the Netherlands (esp. in the UK and US). Check out the very helpful handout Chris made for us right here.
- Lennard Pater talked about Nietzsche and Schopenhauer, revising the idea that Nietzsche completely abandoned the ideas of Schopenhauer to develop a theory of his own.
- We came one step closer to arranging a study retreat!
The seventh WiPRMAPhil took place on Monday, February 20.
There we had a discussion about the pressures of academia and how best to deal with (the stress-related isses resulting from) them. We discussed:
- How common (yet often invisible) stress-related issues are, both in and outside academia
- Whether there is a taboo around not being able to cope with pressure and around being open about your own vulnerability
- Or whether sometimes mental health issues in philosophy are overly normalized as simply being a part of the deal or even romanticized as being a sign of genius
- Whether there are specific traits of academic philosophy and its selective system which form a risk factor for mental health issues
- The importance of preventing underestimation signs of stress (burnout) and depression to prevent them from worsening
- Short-term individual strategies for coping with pressure
- Our long-term wishes and expectations for the broader field and for our own community
A thread has been started to discuss related thoughts and share links on the topic.
The last WiPRMaPhil took place on Monday, march 20.
- Charles talked about how we can create a non-moral normative system of political critique in which we can compare and evaluate two different political regimes. He will give an account of how we can combine the idea of Bernard Williams on the critical theory principle with his notion of legitimacy, without being moralistic or losing ground for political critique.
- Leon talked about whether we should ground a Capabilities Approach in transcendental arguments. His talk will mainly be a reaction to the paper written by Marcus and Rutger on the subject: "The Foundations of Capability Theory: Comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth''.